Thursday, February 18, 2021

Upcoming Web Events

Sunday, February 27, 2021 - 10:00 AM (EST)

Bach, Bagels, and Bob - Bringing New/Old Music to Life

Maestro Robert W. Butts welcomes special guests soprano Timothy Maureen Cole and Dr. Jude Pfister, author and Chief of Cultural Resources at Washington Headquarters, Morristown National Historical Park.

Maestro Butts and guests will discuss bringing unknown music to life - ranging from brand new premiere compositions to the incredible discovery of the 1693 manuscript of La Giuditta by Baroque composer Alessandro Scarlatti.  Dr, Pfister will also discuss the major documents and manuscripts of the collection.  Maestro Butts will discuss the memorable collaborative concerts "Music and Manuscripts" which have featured music associated with documents in the collection - including Scarlatti''s major masterpiece as well as the signed copy of the published book of poetry by 18th Century African-American poet Phyllis Wheatley.

Excerpts from performances will be shown.

The event is a free online zoom event, but registration is required.

Visit to register.

[Image Descriptions: This post features the promotional page for the Baroque Orchestra of New Jersey’s new web series Bach, Bagels, and Bob. Pictured is Maestro Robert W. Butts.]

Thursday, March 18, 2021 - 7:00 PM (EST)

Join The Museum of Early Trades and Crafts (METC) and Morristown National Historical Park Chief Curator Dr. Jude Pfister for a virtual guided tour of the exhibits at the park museum relating to medical care during the Revolutionary War.  

Visit @metcnj for registration details.

[Image Description: This post features the doorway of the model log cabin in the MNHP Discover History gallery. Under the image is a yellow information box that reads “METC and MNHP presents a virtual program, Medical Care During the Hard Winter.”]

Monday, November 9, 2020

Meet the Intern: Izzy Halloran


Izzy Halloran is the newest addition to the Morristown National Historical Park Museum as a (remote) intern. She joined us in October of 2020 for her fall semester. Izzy is a third year student at Oberlin College and Conservatory in Ohio, majoring in Art History and minoring in Creative Writing. Originally from Red Bank, New Jersey, Izzy has always been drawn to the museum setting, fascinated with curatorial, archival, and conservational work. While at the Morristown National Historical Park Museum, Izzy will be researching Indigenous land acknowledgement practices in National Parks, environmental racism, and museum equity, focusing on MNHP's partnership with the Morristown Unmuted project. She aims to gain a better understanding of the inner-workings of a small museum, from interacting with community partners to how the museum’s archives are stored and conserved.

Welcome, Izzy!

Monday, October 26, 2020

Educational Activity - Juneteenth - We Need to Talk


On June 19, 2020 – the anniversary of Juneteenth, Wendy O’Sullivan, Superintendent of the Chesapeake Bay National Park Service office, convened a Zoom Call involving eight distinguished Black professionals in her organization. Their goal was to discuss the intersection of race, history, and the outdoors. In her opening remarks, Superintendent O’Sullivan indicated that “…in this historic moment for our society…we need to start talking again….To truly start listening again and openly talking about the history of systemic racism and inequities in America is what we need to do now.”

This conversation continues within families, organizations and classrooms throughout America and in other countries as well and can be a difficult one.

This Zoom call has been made available on You Tube and is accessible by clicking below. We are posting this blog to facilitate similar discussions in homes or outside organizations and classrooms.

Click Here

The entire video is about ninety minutes in length and consists of the following:

Part 1 – Start to 00:28 minutes – Introductions, personal backgrounds and areas of expertise

Part 2 – 00:28:22 to 01:14:00 – individual experiences in the lives of these participants, and in the Park Service. How have they been impacted by institutional and systemic racism.

Part 3 – 01:14:00 to 01:31:00 – what are recommendations on the question – “what can we do in our work in the NPS to facilitate more equity?”


While the entire video is “…honest, open, thoughtful and inspiring”, Part 2 is relatable to family and classroom discussion. With the assistance of a number of Social Studies Supervisors we have included time-stamped discussion guides for Grades 4-6 and 7-12 for your use. Within each are links to grade appropriate lesson plans. Feel free to adapt the guides as required.

Grades 4 – 6 – Key Vocabulary Terms


Grades 7-12 – Major Points by participant (blank guide plus teacher KEY).


Michael Collins, Educational Volunteer – Cultural Resources Morristown National Historical Park


Citations – Juneteenth – We Need to Talk – 6/19/2020

The Green Book Lesson Plan - 

The Buffalo Soldiers (7-12)-

The Buffalo Soldiers (K-6) -

Wednesday, July 8, 2020

Summer Reading

With the pandemic still restricting travel plans, one’s wanderlust can be eased by adding Weir Farm National Historic Site (Arcadia Publishing) to their summer reading list. The book was written by the artist Xiomaro, who is currently creating a photographic collection for Morristown National Historical Park.  The author uses his photographs – rare, up-close, nationally exhibited images that go beyond the stanchions – to take readers through a journey to explore Connecticut’s first national park (and the only one dedicated to painting).  Weir Farm was the home of Julian Alden Weir (1852-1919), a leading innovator of American Impressionism.  Xiomaro’s work has been described by The New York Times as “unorthodox…photographs, commissioned as artworks rather than as mundane documentation” with a “focus on striking details.” His book is available at, which also offers a free preview.

Tuesday, May 12, 2020

Gibbons v. Ogden

Not too long-ago Morristown National Historical Park received a volume of New Jersey state laws dating from the late eighteenth century. The book, a generous donation from a law firm that was going to “recycle” it, happened to have a signature on the title page, an owner’s mark, perhaps of pride. The name written over two hundred years ago was Aaron Ogden (1756-1839). For many, which included me at first (and apparently including the staff at the unnamed law firm), this name held no significance or relevance at all. Unfortunately, he is someone who has been forgotten by time and does not receive as much attention as other people from the Founding Era such as George Washington or Alexander Hamilton. But at one-point Ogden took his former business partner, Thomas Gibbons, to the United States Supreme Court over the issue of interstate commerce. (Ogden’s long career included being a soldier in the American Revolution, a lawyer, the fifth governor of New Jersey, and a US Senator from New Jersey.)

Aaron Ogden

There are two major people to know about in the history-making legal case involving Ogden: Aaron Ogden and Thomas Gibbons. Aaron Ogden, as we mentioned before, is forgotten in history textbooks although he has an impressive background. He was a native resident of Elizabethtown, now known as Elizabeth. Significantly, his extensive financial interests included the lucrative new industry of steamboat ferries.[1]


Thomas Gibbons
Thomas Gibbons (1757-1826) had a different background when contrasted with his counterpart. He was born in Georgia as the son of a wealthy rice plantation owner. Trained in the law as was Ogden, Gibbons had a different allegiance during the American Revolution. Although the Gibbons family overall favored the American cause, Thomas himself was a loyalist, and often defended the property rights of other loyalists in the Savannah, Georgia area.  After the war, Gibbons, secure in his fortune, purchased a summer home in Elizabethtown, New Jersey. It was during this time that Gibbons first met Aaron Ogden. At the time, both men were successful lawyers and businessmen who saw expanding opportunities in the New York area. In 1811 he moved his family permanently from Georgia to Elizabeth, New Jersey. He was drawn by the economic potential of northern New Jersey and because of his reputation in Georgia which was making life somewhat complicated—this included his having been a loyalist, being a duelist, as well as the rumors of having helped to rig a congressional election.[2] As the nineteenth century dawned the American future looked, if not bright, at least welcoming. Around the same time that Gibbons and Ogden had met and become business partners, there was a very large monopoly set in place that would impact them both in profound ways a decade later.
Founding Father Robert Livingston (1746-1813), of the powerful Livingston family, and inventor Robert Fulton (1765-1815) had contrived to collaborate on steamboat transportation, a method of travel that Livingston had managed to secure a monopoly on in the early nineteenth century from New York state. Livingston used his political influence and family connections in New York to allow for looser monopoly laws, where he served as Chancellor from 1777-1801. Soon after gaining his steamboat license he quickly turned it into a monopoly for steam transport on the waterways in and around New York state. 
In 1807, under Fulton’s design and Livingston’s financial input, the first steamboat, North River, made its maiden voyage from Battery Park in Manhattan to Clermont, the Livingston family manse. The 120-mile journey, while proving the validity of steam power, did encounter engine troubles during their 24-hour journey. The next day they steamed trouble free from Clermont to Albany in a record 8 hours. Livingston and Fulton had proven the power of the steamboat to everyone along the Hudson River.
Fulton and Livingston became wealthy through their steamboat ferry and transportation business. For reference, Livingston and Fulton charged $7 per passenger—which added up quickly. As this bonanza accumulated it swiftly generated competitors. However, Livingston, and now Fulton, had a monopoly within New York waters and they successfully sued multiple potential competitors. Robert Livingston would pass away in 1813 leaving just Robert Fulton to manage the partnership (Fulton himself would pass away in 1815).[3]
Enter the Aaron Ogden and Thomas Gibbons partnership. After Ogden had finished serving as Governor of New Jersey in 1813, he sought a second term but lost in his bid for reelection. He turned his full attention to his business interests, especially the lucrative ferry service then existing and sought to form a partnership with fellow Revolutionary War veteran and politician Jonathan Dayton (1760-1824). Dayton’s shares in an already existing partnership which Dayton and Ogden had previously formed had been secretly sold to Thomas Gibbons in 1813. This came as a complete shock to Ogden since Gibbons and he did not have a formal business partnership at that point. Although, they did have a bit of history before Gibbons bought into the partnership with Ogden. They were both part of the upper-class in Elizabeth. Gibbons would ride around town in a luxurious two-horse coach and manage a popular tavern known as Union Hotel while also investing in Elizabeth financial establishments. The two of them did have a bit of a legal background together too, such as in 1803 when Ogden and Gibbons won a land dispute in state court. On a personal note, the two often dined at each other's homes.

There had been troublesome times for the two of them. Gibbons gave away half his shares in their partnership, which included waterfront property and several sloops, to his daughter Ann; she was married to John M. Trumbull, whose uncle was the famous painter, John Trumbull, of a prominent family in Connecticut. Ogden was not aware of the transfer. Ann and John had been married since 1810. John was the black sheep of the family due to most of his family being successful where he has been living off of his family’s wealth. Trumbull wanted these lucrative shares in order to live up to his name and status as a Trumbull. Even with the shares, he was forced to petition for an act of insolvency to the Connecticut General Assembly in August 1814.[4] Trumbull insisted that Gibbons leave Ann one-third of his estate in his will and wanted Ann to sue her father if he would not. Gibbons would end up rewriting his lease agreement with Ogden to make sure that Trumbull would get less money, however this did make Ogden uneasy. As the year’s progressed, relations between Ogden, Gibbons, and Trumbull were worsened. Trumbull sought to lower the lease rates and Ogden threatened to divide up the business. Gibbons was disgusted by this and demanded Ogden buy him out the business to which Ogden refused. Next, Gibbons would send a petition to the New Jersey legislature that had the purpose to publicly humiliate Ogden by accusing him of cheating Ann Trumbull out of her share of the business.[5]

Ogden’s start in the steamboat business came about by developing his own version of the steam engine and owning plants to produce it. In 1804 he hired Daniel Dod, an inventor from Connecticut, to build a steam engine factory along with his own steam engines. The steam engine was different from the Fulton engine; furthermore, Dod possessed several federal patents that would prove useful in any potential legal battle with Fulton.

In addition to picking up passengers between New Brunswick and New York City, Ogden had hoped to petition Livingston and Fulton to pick up supplies on his dock during trips between New Brunswick and New York City. Fulton agreed but asked for a fee that Ogden could never pay.[6] Ogden then petitioned the partnership to give him a license to operate steamboats in New York waters right before 1811. During this time, he was still partnered with Dayton.

To put pressure on Fulton, Ogden went to the New Jersey state legislature to discuss his grievances in January of 1811. As governor, he was uniquely positioned to leverage the legislature. They came to the conclusion, “the citizens of New-Jersey have a full and equal right to navigate and to have and use boats upon all the waters lying between the States of New-Jersey and New-York.”
[7]  To combat the New York monopoly legislation, New Jersey agreed that steamboats registered in New York would be seized upon entering New Jersey waters. This was different than New York’s laws due to New Jersey taking heed to the limited federal regulations there were at the time. At the time, states were making intra-state commerce decisions without factoring in the inter-state aspects. Essentially, Ogden was committed to putting a boat in New York waters but not allow a New York boat in New Jersey waters. This was all a result of the loose federal oversight of interstate commerce. After much pressure and tougher laws from the New Jersey legislature, he was steaming his boat into New York waters in defiance of New York law. His first vessel, the Sea Horse, was completed in 1811 and could make nine miles an hour.[8]

Against this backdrop, Ogden and Fulton were still going to court against each other. Ogden would continue to challenge the New York monopoly that Livingston and Fulton had created. In return, they would challenge him on his New Jersey monopoly, each one finding different ways to ferry people back and forth once they reached state waters. Eventually Aaron Ogden and John R. Livingston, heir to Robert Livingston’s share of the company, came to an agreement after battling in the New Jersey state house. Ogden could operate steamboats from Elizabethtown to New York City for ten years starting in May 1814 in exchange for $600 annually and sharing his wharf in New York City.
[9] This would later lead to Ogden and the Livingston’s settling out patents and debts for the Livingston-Fulton agreement, which Ogden would benefit from.[10] In 1815, Ogden would purchase a license from the Livingston-Fulton monopoly to operate his steamboats. After being in Trenton in February of 1815, Fulton, on his way back home to New York City stopped in Jersey City to see the construction of his new steamer. To save time he and his party decided to cross the frozen Hudson River by foot. His friend fell through the ice and into the freezing water. Fulton jumped in to save him and as a result he developed pneumonia and ultimately died on February 23, 1815.

Eventually, arguments between Ogden and Gibbons became public. The two partners did not forget each other's past in the Revolution and used it to slander one another—one a patriot and one a loyalist. The two men were bent on discrediting each other. Ogden would have Gibbons arrested on a nonpayment of a note aboard the
Sea Horse, Ogden’s own vessel, in a highly public fashion.

Relations between the Trumbull’s and Gibbons were also disintegrating. Thomas Gibbons’ wife, Ann, came back to Elizabethtown to defend her interest. When she arrived, Gibbons, enraged, forced her out of the house. This would lead her seek information on obtaining a divorce from Richard Stockton and Aaron Ogden. They both knew that a divorce procedure would publicly humiliate Gibbons.
[11] Gibbons, true to his dueling past, issued a response to Ogden. On July 16th, 1816, Gibbons would post a printed notice on the door of Ogden’s home challenging him to a duel for the interference that he had done to Gibbons' family. Ogden in turn, declined the challenge for a duel, issued a public apology and filed trespassing charges against Gibbons who would escape arrest by a timely vacation to Saratoga Springs, New York. From there he headed to Boston and printed scandalous pamphlets that were designed to destroy the reputation of his enemies; he had fifty copies to distribute to family and friends and would only stop if Ann was to drop her divorce plans, which she agreed to. Gibbons would now focus his anger on Ogden and had the intentions to take him to court over his monopoly rights.[12]  
In July of 1817 Gibbons finally started operating his own steamboat business to rival Ogden. He constructed a landing near Elizabethtown and subcontracted to another business to transfer passengers from Staten Island to his vessels before heading to New Jersey ports. He purchased a steamboat by the name of
Mouse of the Mountain. Most importantly he hired a young captain by the name of Cornelius Vanderbilt to pilot his ship. The two of them would immediately create a profitable business together.[13]

In 1818, Gibbons and Vanderbilt would start to run direct services to New York City on Gibbons’ steamboat the Bellona to cut even more into Ogden’s profits. This would cause Ogden to file a motion in the New York courts for operating in New York waters on October 20th, 1818. Gibbons had planned exactly for this to open a pathway to the U.S Court of Appeals and then to the Supreme Court. Gibbons would be given the opportunity by John R. Livingston to join in on their monopoly, but Gibbons would not want it, he would rather go to court against Ogden. Chancellor Kent of New York ruled in favor of Ogden and barred Gibbons from operating in New York waters on May 3, 1819. Chancellor Kent had been hearing steamboat cases since the days of Livingston and Fulton and was well acquainted with the case law. He served as Chief Justice of the New York Supreme court from 1804-1814 and then Chancellor from 1814-1823. He was very influential in the path the New York steamboat monopoly had taken.  That path opened the way for Gibbons bringing the case to the Supreme Court as Gibbons did have a federal coasting license. Interesting enough, during this time Gibbons and Ogden came to an uneasy truce where Ogden would ferry passengers from New York to Elizabethtown and then Gibbons would ferry them to New Brunswick.[14]
Once again, Ogden and Gibbons would find themselves in court together—on opposite sides. Gibbons would be contesting Ogden’s monopoly rights in the New York courts and presenting that his federal coasting license was valid for commerce in New York waters, but New York did not interpret it that way. Rather, they held state laws were greater than federal laws when it came to commerce. Finally, in September of 1821, Gibbons' appeal reached the Supreme Court but was dismissed since the 1819 case of Gibbons v. Ogden never reached a verdict by Chancellor Kent. By this time Gibbons had brought Daniel Webster on as his attorney for the case. On January 17, 1822 Gibbons would be met with defeat in the New York courts. Now the Supreme Court could take up Gibbons v. Ogden.[15]
A lot would happen between January 1822 and February 1824 when the Supreme Court was finally able to take up the case. Chief Justice John Marshall’s court had ruled on a number of landmark cases previous to this, with the most memorable of them being McCulloch v. Maryland in 1819.

On February 4, 1824, a large crowd gathered in the courtroom as the case
Gibbons v. Ogden was finally being heard. Webster, Gibbons’ attorney, opened his argument by asking if New York had the right to create a monopoly? Would this conflict with federal laws? He also said that the framers of the Constitution never meant to give states the power to regulate commerce. Ogden’s attorneys, Samuel Southard and Joseph Hopkinson, argued that the Tenth Amendment allowed state laws to be struck down only if they were totally contradictory to federal interests and that the monopoly did not violate any federal commerce power. Oakley also said that the framers meant to regulate trade for taxation purposes, not to control travel and commerce between states. The oral arguments would go on for days until February 9. Both Gibbons’ and Ogden’s attorneys had produced every major argument that could be mustered. This was very much an argument of states’ rights on Ogden’s behalf. [16] During this time in the Republic, the Supreme Court was in a period where State’s Rights were being argued and decided upon—usually to the disadvantage of the states. Gibbons saw his ownership of a federal coasting license as a way to bring the matter to the Supreme Court as an issue of federalism.

On March 2nd, Chief Justice Marshall issued a verdict on the case. Marshall would cite Article 1 Section 8 of the Constitution which states Congress has the power to regulate commerce with foreign nations, several states, and Indian tribes. He also went on to define commerce as commercial intercourse between nations and parts of nations, thus navigation would be commerce. That would pertain to both cargo and passengers. He ruled that Gibbons’ federal coasting license permitted him to operate his boats in New York waters. Ogden was defeated after trying so hard to bust a monopoly and then join in on it.

The Mansion at Florham, Fairleigh Dickinson University.
This reason this case had become so prominent an issue was the immediate money at stake but more importantly the potential money involved. It was obvious that steamboats were to become a lucrative business far beyond what they already were. Today the manifestations of this nearly two century old decision can be seen very close to the Morristown National Historical Park.
Mead Hall, Drew University.
Gibbons would end up building a mansion shortly after his victory in Madison, New Jersey. This building stands today as Mead Hall, on the campus of Drew University. Cornelius Vanderbilt would go on to become a transportation tycoon and make the Vanderbilt name synonymous with extravagant family wealth. On the campus of Fairleigh Dickinson University sits the mansion called Florham. It was built by a granddaughter of Cornelius Vanderbilt, Florence Vanderbilt Twombly.


Cox, Thomas H. Gibbons v. Ogden, Law, and Society in the Early Republic. Athens: Ohio University Press, 2009. Accessed April 16, 2020. ProQuest Ebook Central.

Baker, Leonard. John Marshall: A Life in Law. New York: Macmillan, 1974.

Baxter, Maurice Glen. The Steamboat Monopoly. Gibbons v. Ogden, 1824. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1972.


Supreme Court Historical Society at

Papers of John Marshall Digital Edition

[1] Maurice Glen. Baxter. The Steamboat Monopoly. Gibbons v. Ogden, 1824 (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1972), 25.
[2]Thomas H. Cox Gibbons v. Ogden, Law, and Society in the Early Republic. Athens: Ohio University Press, 2009, 69-71
[3] Law and Society, 38-39.
[4] Law and Society, 72.
[5] Ibid, 73.
[6] Law and Society, 71.
[7] Ibid, 72.
[8] Ibid.
[9] Law and Society, 78.
[10] Ibid, 88.
[11] Ibid.
[12] Law and Sociert.89
[13] Ibid, 90.
[14] Law and Society, 94.
[15] Ibid, 117
[16] Law and Society, 130-134
[17] Steamboat Monopoly, 49-52.

This blog post by Brian Csobor, spring intern from Rutgers University. 

Thursday, April 30, 2020

Daniel Shays and His Rebellion

There are no known illustrations of Daniel Shays.
This rendition is from Bickerstaff’s
Genuine Boston Almanac (Boston) - 1787.
Captain Shays’ image appears on the left.
PART 1 - What was Shays’ Rebellion and Why is it Important?

In 2006, The History Channel released a DVD series entitled ‘Ten Days that Unexpectedly Changed America’. Episode 10 focused on Shays’ Rebellion in Springfield, Massachusetts, which took place on January 25, 1787 at the US Arsenal there. Thousands of residents, mostly farmers from the western part of the state, attempted to seize the arsenal and then march to Boston to overthrow a government that had seized the property of indebted farmers. [i]

How could this happen in Massachusetts which had led the protest against the British, and the War for Independence? Historically, why does this Rebellion become so important? The immediate issue focused on attempts in Massachusetts to retire their Revolutionary War debt. Farmers who had fought in the American Revolution had been ‘paid’ for their service, if at all, by Continental dollars and financial bonds and notes which had become increasingly worthless. Over time, the notes had been purchased at fractional values from these veterans/farmers by financial speculators near Boston.

In Massachusetts, Governor James Bowdoin had a personal stake in having bonds and notes owned by financial speculators bought by the state at face value plus 6% interest. The purchase cost would be paid for by harsh increases in property taxes in gold and silver, not paper currency.[ii] Farmers and artisans were left in a bad position as they were mired in personal debt, oppressed by heavy taxes levied on behalf of these wealthy speculators who controlled the state debt.[iii]

Beginning in 1786, crowds of debt ridden farmers who called themselves ‘Regulators’ after protestors from the colonial Carolinas in the 1760s,  began to shut down some state courts in counties in Western Massachusetts to prevent these courts from seizing their lands to pay the taxes.[iv]  Without legislative approval, Governor Bowdoin on January 4 called for the establishment of a privately funded militia to stop the protest.  The protest became militant in January 1787 when Daniels Shays, a Revolutionary War veteran from Massachusetts, and others led a group of protesters to the arsenal at Springfield. On January 25, 1787 a brief confrontation led to the death of 4 protestors and injuries to others. The regulators dispersed and the rebellion was over.[v] The rebellion ended in a whimper and was named Shays Rebellion by its opponents after who they considered the leader of the rebellion, even though other leaders were more proactive. In its aftermath, trials in Massachusetts led to hundreds of indictments and 18 death sentences, which resulted in only 2 hangings. Four thousand confessions and promises of loyalty helped return the state to more normalcy.[vi] Governor Bowdoin was voted out of office in a landslide election won by John Hancock. Hancock was wealthy but popular. The direct tax which hurt farmers was replaced by one which affected speculators and the tax on farmland was reduced dramatically.[vii]

So why is it so important? Shays Rebellion caused panic and dismay in Massachusetts and other states, in the opinions of many leaders of the Continental Congress and other Founding Fathers. It was an important catalyst which led to the Constitutional Convention which convened in May, 1787 to address the limitations of the Articles of Confederation. In the opinions of many, the Central Government needed to be stronger, to address problems like the public debt that Massachusetts sought to address. [viii]

Saturday, March 21, 2020

COVID-19 Park Closure

Effective immediately, all Morristown National Historical Park site locations and grounds are closed.

Morristown National Historical Park (NHP), in response to State of New Jersey’s Executive Order 107 issued on March 21st directing all residents to stay at home until further notice to curb the spread of COVID-19, is announcing that all park gates providing access to the grounds and trails at Jockey Hollow Area (including restroom facilities), Fort Nonsense Area, and the New Jersey Brigade/Cross Estate Area are closed until the Executive Order is lifted.

🚫Washington’s Headquarters Museum and the Ford Mansion remain closed.

🚫Jockey Hollow Visitor Center and Wick House remain closed.

🚫All visitor access gates to the Jockey Hollow Area and restrooms will remain closed.

🚫All visitor access gates to Fort Nonsense Area will remain closed.

🚫All visitor access gates to the New Jersey Brigade/Cross Estate Area will remain closed.

The health and safety of our visitors, employees, volunteers, and partners at Morristown NHP is our number one priority. The National Park Service (NPS) is working with federal, state, and local authorities to closely monitor COVID-19. The National Park Service (NPS) encourages all visitors to park lands to adhere to guidance from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and state and local public health authorities to protect visitors and employees. #covid19 #nj #coronavirus #parkclosure #morristownnhpclosed #stayathomeorder #stayhomesavelives .

Please check our park website for the latest updates: and stay tuned for virtual museum features next week! .

[Image Description: This post features a closeup image of a skeleton keyhole at the historic Ford Mansion. 📸 Sarah Minegar].

Friday, March 13, 2020

Meet the Intern: Brian Csobor

Brian Csobor is a recent addition to the Culture Resources Division as an intern. He joined us in February of 2020 for his spring semester. He is junior at Rutgers University New Brunswick studying both history and political science. Brian attended Middlesex County College before transferring to Rutgers where he earned an AA in history. Here at MNHP he is researching the 1824 Supreme Court case of Gibbons v. Ogden. In doing so he hopes to gain an understanding of  legal history and what it takes to be involved with public history. To help with his project he will be using letters and books and from the Lloyd W. Smith rare book collection here at the park

Welcome Brian!